The Green Swastika Environmentalism in the Third Reich

From Malthus to Mifepristone: A Primer on the Population Control Movement

The History of the Population Control Movement 1798 to 1998

Dictatorship of the Landlords - The Green Roots of the Housing Crisis

Cultural Marxism and the Alt-Right

The Meaning of Corporatism

356 Enviro-critical Websites and additional info about the organized enviro-critical movement

Pierre Trudeau: Eco-fascist

A Primer for the Paris Climate Talks

Jorge Bergoglio's Green Encyclical

Environmentalism and Aboriginal Supremacism (Part 2): The Mobilization of Aboriginal Opposition to the Northern Gateway Pipeline

Environmentalism and Aboriginal Supremacism in Canada - Part 1 - Idle No More

Of Buffalo and Biofuel - More Tales of Environmentalism in Alberta

War on Coal

In Praise of the Jobs, Growth and Long-term Prosperity Act (Bill C-38)

Environmentalism and Edmonton Land Use Politics

The "Tar Sands" Campaign and the Suppression of North America's Energy Potential

Desertec and Environmentalism's North African Campaign

The Environmental Movement in Alberta

Environmentalism 400 BC

Spirit of NAWAPA

Waldheim's Monster:
United Nations' Ecofascist Programme

Early 19th Century British "Environmentalism"

Environmentalism's Appropriation of Christianity

Environmentalism's Environment

The Continental Counter-Enlightenment

The American Eco-Oligarchy update

If Only This Were About Oil


Who is Affraid of The Big Green Wolf

The Gore Presidential Bid

The Groundbreaking Career of Doctor Science

The English Environmental Elite, Global Warming, and The Anglican Church

The Great Global Warming Hoax

The American Oligarchy's Economic Warfare Campaign on British Columbians

If Only This Were About Oil

(This article was written prior to the most recent war in Iraq in response to the highly successful campaign by the international environmental movement to blame the impending conflict on the petroleum industry.)

Conventional wisdom has it the impending war in the Gulf has something to do with oil. The theory goes like this: Uncle Sam has an uncontrollable appetite for petroleum. America's oil reserves are dwindling. Hence, Uncle Sam must conquer new oilfields, like the ones in Iraq, to feed his addiction.

The Iraqi government seems to think oil is the American ulterior motive. So do many in the US Democratic Party. So do most people in the international peace movement. But what do these people know about non-conventional oilfields?

This is a relevant question, for if alternative sources to Middle Eastern crude oil are readily at hand, then the portrait of an oil-desperate North America is fundamentally flawed.

More importantly, the two news stories dominating both the Canadian mainstream, and alternative, news media these days are the coming war in the Persian Gulf and the Kyoto ratification debate. Both of these discourses need to be viewed in light of what is now well known about non-conventional oil.

On November 25-26, 2002, the International Energy Agency held a private conference in Calgary with leading oil-patch bean counters on precisely the topic of non-conventional oil fields.

The International Energy Agency is a decades-old European think-tank and quasi-public ministry of energy statistics. They rented rooms in the Calgary Hyatt to hold a series of executive brainstorming sessions. Follow-up meetings were held at the offices of several key non-conventional oil companies.

The primary document circulated before the conference was the IEA-produced "Background Paper on IEA Conference on Prospects for Non-conventional Oil." The paper makes clear the IEA, when using the term "non-conventional oil," is referring to oil-sands and to a lesser extent coal shales operations. They are aware of wider definitions of non-conventional oil that would include biomass fuels, natural-gas-to-liquid fuels, ultra-deep offshore, and high Arctic deposits. While not disparaging the potential energy of these untapped hydrocarbon sources, the IEA is trying to focus industry and consumer attention on oil-sands alone, and for good reason.

top of the page

Around 70 countries possess oil-sands regions, but the overwhelming distribution of these neglected reserves is in three countries: Russia, Venezuela, and Canada. The two most important reserves are in northeastern Alberta and in the Orinoco region of southern Venezuela. In an oil-sands area, the ground is very oily down to depths of hundreds of metres. These dense and deep fields are 10-12% comprised of bitumen tar. Beneath the layer of tar-sand lie numerous large reserves of "heavy oil" also requiring non-conventional methods of drilling. But the main reserves are in the tar.

Oil-sands oil is not drilled down to, and then pumped up like conventional oil. The oil is dug out of the ground with large shovels and placed into large dump trucks, then dumped into specialized conveyers linked to large refineries. The tar then must be steamed and refined to produce marketable oil.

The fields are humongous. Alberta's oil-sands cover 141,000 square kilometres of the northern and eastern regions of the province, an area roughly within a 300- to 400-kilometre arc southwest of Lake Athabasca. In total they possess 1.63 trillion barrels of oil. The amount of reserves harvestable with current equipment at current prices is 310 billion barrels, an amount exceeding the petroleum reserves of Saudi Arabia.

Back in the 1970s, when OPEC-related oil price increases prompted pioneering research, the fields were called the "Athabasca tar-sands." In the 1980s and 1990s, public relations persons from the companies involved changed the name of the area to the "Alberta oil-sands." Tar is a boo word. Nevertheless, President Bush has recently referred to the area as "those Canadian tar-pits."

Whatever the name, output from the area has gone from zero in the 1970s to 654,000 barrels a day throughout 2001. This includes primarily the work of ground miners Suncor and Syncrude but also the work of 11 heavy-oil steam-assisted drilling projects.

The tar-sands industry is a revolutionary development both because of the scale of the reserves and because in today's market the companies involved are profitable commercial enterprises. This has gradually gained the attention of the energy planners of today, particularly the Euro-centred thinkers such as in the IEA. They summarize past and future developments (all monetary figures in this article are in $US):
"Between the early 1980s and the late 1990s, Canadian operating costs fell from $22 to $10/barrel through continuous process improvements and recent major innovations in truck and shovel mining and hydro-transport techniques. Industry analysts anticipate that further improvements in technology and operating methods may reduce average operating costs (in money of the day) for integrated mining and upgrading units from $8-9/barrel today to $7 by 2004 and to $6 by 2015 .

Publicly announced development plans for the period 1996 to 2010 amount to nearly $40 billion, of which $7 billion was spent to the second half of 2000. According to the Canadian National Energy Board, production of synthetic crude and bitumen is projected to triple to 1.7 million barrels per day by 2015 ."
top of the page

There have been a number of innovations over the last 25 years in oil-sand technology. One innovation has been "hydro-transport" or mixing the oil-sand with very hot water and transporting the steaming slurry to the refinery via pipeline. The engineers have modified this process so that the product arrives at the refinery with much of the work of the refinery already done. As well, the "Natural Froth" that naturally formed in the inner surface of the pipeline has been successfully re-deployed into a sheath-like device creating a super-lubricity in the oil-sand pipelines. Two other major innovations were the implementation of the world's largest shovels and the world's largest dump trucks. Front-end loaders capable of digging 43 cubic metres a scoop and 380-ton trucks are now popular tourist attractions in northern Alberta.

A word should be said about the measure of the size of the deposit. There are 300 billion barrels of extractible oil and 1.4 trillion barrels not considered economically feasible. The current level of production (700,000 barrels per day) was not considered feasible thirty years ago. This level of production could go on for 400 years before we reach the difficult-to-obtain deposits. Moreover, present trends continuing, extraction technologies will have progressed to the point where a substantial portion of the 1.4 trillion barrels currently too costly to extract will be within the range of the economically feasible within the next 30 years. In short, the Alberta oil-sands could easily meet all of North America's petroleum needs for rest of the century, with production costs for much of that period well south of $5 per barrel.

Oil-sand oil recovery was an experimental industry in the 1970s. Today it accounts for 40% of Alberta's, and 30% of all Canada's, crude oil production. The bulk of this oil is exported to the United States.

The main point is this: Uncle Sam is importing 11.6 million barrels of oil a day. They are buying 2.7 million barrels a day from Persian Gulf states. The security costs of maintaining a presence in the region, the fighting of wars, provision of military aid, maintenance of bases, etc. has exceeded $200 billion over the last 15 years and is likely to double in the near future.

The December 6, 2002 Economist provides some speculation on the impending war's cost. The optimists are guessing it will be a $50 billion war with a little more than that being spent in a follow-on occupation for total of Iraq-related war expenses of around $120 billion. The pessimists see a massive, protracted war costing hundreds of billions followed by a multi-year occupation, the West-Bank-times-forty scenario, creating a total cost over the next several years well above a trillion dollars.

We know that a $40 billion investment in the Alberta oil-sands will culminate in an output of 1.7 million barrels a day of Sweet Syncrude Blend, at $6 per barrel production cost. Hence, an investment in the neighbourhood of a mere $80-100 billion would allow increased oil-sand production to completely eclipse Middle Eastern oil imports.

What's more, the Alberta oil-sands could sustain that level of production until the year 3702 AD.

So, in terms of a cost-benefit analysis, these "wars for oil" don't make much sense. If Uncle Sam were really that desperate for an oil fix, he would tap the vast Canadian or Venezuelan reserves before he would spend several times as much to go after Iraq's relatively meagre deposits. There are also vast reserves of oil and gas in and around Alaska and off the Pacific coast. North America is a powder keg of fossil fuels reserves. The size of its coal reserves is mind-boggling.

No, if the war with Iraq were just over oil, it would not happen at all.

This war is about exactly what the National Security Council says it is about. It is about arms control. The war is an effort to forcibly suppress a military-industrial upstart.

If only it were about oil.

By William Kay BA LL B
top of the page


Review of Snyder's Black Earth

How Green Were the Nazis

The American Environmental Movement - The American Counter-Movement Perspective

Aboriginal Supremicism Part Three - Gallagher's "Resource Rulers" condensed and critiqued

Gasman's The Scientific Origins of National Socialism

Darwall's The Age of Global Warming

Musser's Nazi Oaks

Biehl and Staudenmaier's Ecofascism Revisited

Nickson's Eco-fascists

Gasman's Haeckel's Monism and the Birth of Fascist Ideology

Delingpole's Watermelons

Dowie's Conservation Refugees

Macdonald's Green Inc.

Laframboise and McKitrick on the IPCC

Markham's "Environmental Organizations in Modern Germany"

Petropoulos' Royals and the Reich

Plimer's Heaven and Earth: Global Warming the Missing Science

Dominick's German Environmental Movement 1871 to 1971

Jacoby's Hidden History of American Conservation

Cahill's Who Owns The World

The Persistent Profundity of Professor Mayer

Fascism 101 (Oxford Handbook)

The Nazi-Enviro Connection: Uekoetter's "Green and Brown"

US "Environmentalism" in the 1930s (Review of Phillips' "This Land, This Nation")

Gibson's Environmentalism

"The Deniers" Condensed
(Global Warming Hoax Part II)

Review of Moore's Social Origins of Dictatorship

Review of Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature

Review of The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements

Bramwell's trilogy on The Hidden History of Environmentalism

Review of Degregori's Agriculture and Modern Technology

Review of Nichols Fox's Against the Machine

Review of Brian Masters' The Dukes

Review of Joel Bakan's The Corporation

Review of Michael Crichton's State of Fear

Review of Paul Driessen's Eco-Imperialism: Green Power, Black Death

Review of Janet Beihl's Finding Our Way

Review of Bradley's Climate Alarmism Reconsidered

Review of Pennington's Liberating the Land

Precedents for the "Global Warming" campaign: A review of Richard Grove's Green Imperialism
Designed by W3Media. Hosted by W3Media